or its because of the artist who actually drew and rendered a tenth tail and didn't notice till later and doesn't even mention it in their description as a way of accepting their own mistakes and claims its because of the angle and positioning of the tail as a way to cover their ass even though the obvious two spots the tenth tail both come to a tip and the angle of the second location (back middle) doesn't work like that to make it give the illusion of a tenth tail so its probably just an accident but i can't get over how they didn't admit they made a mistake and instead "corrects" every comment pointing it out
Of course I can correct it to make it look more like nine tails but nobody seems to think one tail can go back another. But Maybe its because of the lighting of that tail that it looks wrong.
This was my intention, but I can change the lighting, delete the tip and make the small beginning of the tail that looks like a small tail longer so it fits withe the rest if it bothers people so much.
i think its more because of the point the the fur comes to making it look like the end of the tail it doesn't look like there's much of a substance behind the tail that overlaps if, so it looks like its just fur stretching off the tip of the tail. the light coming from behind it also makes it look like the edge of a triangle making it look even more like a tenth tail.